James Snell wrote:
In any case, we're talking about something as simple as the name of a single element. I just don't see any real technical value in changing it's name. It doesn't make processing any easier. It doesn't change any of the functional semantics. It doesn't address any critical bugs in the design. It just doesn't do anything.
I don't think asking or looking for "technical value" is that relevant here. Names are important [witness the arguments over the name "RSS"]. In markup, element naming tends to matter.
In this case replacing atom:feed with atom:collection doesn't help me personally understand the format better - I'm 0 on PaceCollection.
cheers Bill
