/ Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | On Jan 26, 2005, at 7:16 PM, Graham wrote: | |> Can you outline the problem[s] that having a icon link tag in the |> feed might cause? HTML already has a meta tag for it, so it seems |> like a simple feature-parity issue. | | Well, I don't think we're after feature-parity with HTML :) | | Seriously, the existing "HTML feature" by which we mean conventional | web-browser feature, works by fetching /favicon.ico; so Atom client
I thought modern browsers followed the "icon" link:
<link rel="icon" href="/graphics/nwn.png" type="image/png" />
(in preference to, if not instead of, attempting the grotesque hack
of grabbing /favicon.ico)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | You must not think me necessarily
http://nwalsh.com/ | foolish because I am facetious, nor
| will I consider you necessarily wise
| because you are grave.--Sydney Smith
pgppRT92QZlHc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
