Graham wrote:
On 4 Feb 2005, at 2:37 am, Tim Bray wrote:

On the other hand, the notion that sometimes you have collections of feeds is easy to understand, easy to verbalize, and widely evidenced in practice (cf PubSub & friends), if not perhaps widely seen outside of geekland. So I think I'm +1 on PaceAggregationDocument. (And I think if we adopted that we could certainly lose PaceHeadInEntry, right Bob?)

If you removed the ability to have entries within the feeds in aggregation documents, I'm in. PaceHeadInEntry covers a fundamentally different task.

Why in the world should we define some other document format? OPML will do that just fine.

Robert Sayre

Reply via email to