On 4/2/05 2:06 PM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you removed the ability to have entries within the feeds in > aggregation documents, I'm in. PaceHeadInEntry covers a fundamentally > different task. > > A collection of feeds would be something like a list of blogs about a > certain topic? You get all the information you need in the feed-head, > and supplying entries is fairly redundant. Essentially supplying recent > entries from those feeds would be extra metadata about the feed.
I think the purpose of PaceAggregationDocument is to provide a means to subscribe to an intermediary aggregator like pubsub, and thus receive entries. A collection of feeds for the purpose of a blog roll (ie. no entries) can be modelled in atom as it currently stands - each entry is descriptive about some resource, being a feed, and you'd just have a <link rel=alternate /> to the feed itself. e.
