On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:56:32 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For me, I'd like the comfort of knowing that a V1.0 feed will continue > to be valid with respect to future versions of the specifications, and > that tools written to consume V1.0 feeds will continue to work with > subsequent versions of the specification. > > RSS 0.9x (including 2.0) is evidence that the former is possible (I can > cite some minor incompatibilities, but these are merely exceptions that > prove the rule). I do believe that the latter is also possible. > > Without ever changing the namespace.
+1 And +1 to PaceRemoveVersionAttr, particularly in light of Atom being a Must Understand vocabulary. -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
