Clearly, I meant atom:updated not atom:modified... My apologies for the
slip.
bob wyman
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Bray
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Mark Nottingham'; 'Paul Hoffman'; 'Atom WG'
Subject: Re: Call for final Paces for consideration: deadline imminent
On Feb 4, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Bob Wyman wrote:
> Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> That means that you're not allowed to [use] the same atom:id in any
>> two entries, ever.
> We have atom:modified in order to indicate that an instance is a
> modified version of a previously published entry.
We do? I don't think so. -Tim
