Thanks, Sam.
Everyone: as Tim and I said last week, this is the last set of Paces we are considering for inclusion in the format document. If it's not on this list, it isn't considered unless you can show that there is a dire technical or security flaw in the document.
Please comment on each Pace separately. Even if you sent in a +1, 0, or -1 previously on a particular Pace, send it in again. Hopefully, add a short or long comment on why you feel it should or should not be considered part of the Atom core. Aggregated lists are cute, but greatly hurt the ability to hold a conversation.
Some of the Paces in this last round cover interesting and useful topics. Note, however, that "interesting and useful" does not mean core to Atom. We don't/can't have a strict definition of what is core to the protocol, but after over a year, many of us have a good feeling for that.
And, let's remember to have useful Subject: lines, OK? If a thread changes direction, please change the subject line. Thanks!
--Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
