On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:47:51 +0000, Bill de h�ra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 on the concept. I've seen enough cases in the last week to suggest > it's useful. +1 > -1 on "@profile" - use an @rel to hold the content instead. I'm not sure > whether atom:feed should get an @rel or whether we should use > atom:feed/atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Not sure on this - the @profile name might act as a good hint to its purpose. +0, looking forward to some refactoring of the proposals... -- http://dannyayers.com
