On 9 Feb 2005, at 4:34 pm, Julian Reschke wrote:
Paul Hoffman wrote:...Shouldn't we at least give content producers the hint that producing XHTML content is preferred over HTML? (sorry if I'm opening a can of worms here)Why would one be preferred over the other? They both have their strengths and weaknesses. We're not in the business of saying "this newer one is better".
That's an interesting statement. Does type="HTML" have *any* strengths compared to type="XHMTL" (expect being easier to produce if you don't have XHMTL in the first place?).
That's an interesting statement. Does type="XHTML" have *any* strengths compared to type="HTML" (expect being easier to produce if you don't have HTML in the first place?).
Graham
