Re: On PaceXhtmlNamespaceDiv

[Martin Duerst]

(BAt 20:44 05/02/17, Bill de h$B".(Bra wrote:
(B >
(B >Martin Duerst wrote:
(B >> At 19:03 05/02/16, Bill de h$Bec!V(Bra wrote:
(B
(B >>  >The point I'm seeing here is that creating markup using string 
(Bconcats is inherently fragile. No surpise there. Wrt namespaces, fragility 
(Bis eliminated when you stop using  defaults (but there are other 
(Bconsiderations which keep string concat fragile). Use of div covers off the 
(BXHTML case.
(B >> Yes, use of div covers that case. But that doesn't mean that if
(B >> some people want to use div, everybody has to use div.
(B >
(B >It does (I've never said otherwise) - there is a div tax.
(B
(BI'm okay with those paying div tax who think they need a div.
(BI'm not okay with everybody paying div tax for no apparent
(Bgeneral benefit.
(B
(BRegards,    Martin.