On 19 Feb 2005, at 11:23 am, Henry Story wrote:
Let me make my point even clearer. If something is "fundamentally incompatible",
then it should be *dead-easy* to prove or reveal this incompatibility.
i) Syndication documents shouldn't ever contain multiple versions of the same entry*.
ii) Archive documents apparently need to be able to contain multiple versions of the same entry.
* for the simple reason that it makes them an order of magnitude harder to process and display correctly (and often impossible to display correctly, since it won't always be clear which is the latest version).
Your wittering on about conceptual models doesn't make you better than us.
Graham
