On Mar 7, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
>for some implementors, HTML is actually easier, if they are handing a chunk of bytes to an HTML rendering control, they'd rather not reconstruct the syntax from the infoset, they'd rather just take an opaque chunk of bytes.
I really hope they don't take an opaque chunk of bytes, because if they do, they'll have no clue about the character encoding.
Not true; if you can parse the XML to find the <atom:content> then you know the character encoding and can tell your HTML renderer. -Tim
