On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:38:55 -0500, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim Bray wrote: > > > > EDITORIAL: > > > > There are a couple of places where we use "uri" in the markup, > > specifically the "atom:uri" element (3.2.2) and the "uri" attribute of > > "atom:generator" (4.2.5). > > > > In both cases they're not actually URIs, they're IRIs, so the name is > > WRONG, > > Keeping the name atom:uri is exactly what Martin, author of RFC3987 and > PaceIRI, suggested.
This is the reason I'm +1 on keeping it 'atom:uri'. -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
