/ Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh wrote:
|> I'm not sure the -06 draft tells a consistent story about
|> extensibility.
| [...]
|> Should they also be allowed *between* atom:entry elements in a feed?
|
| As the spec uses "interleave" content models, I think they are/will...

In the -06 draft, a feed is an interleave of metadata elements followed
by a sequence of 0 or more atom:entry elements.

| though I wonder why interlaced content models are used instead of
| "ordered" content models... that would also allow DTD or XML Schema
| (or any other schema requiring deterministic content models) to be
| used to validate Atom documents...

Because the spec says they aren't ordered.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Where it is permissible both to die and
http://nwalsh.com/            | not to die, it is an abuse of valour to
                              | die.-- Mencius

Attachment: pgp6J0Ng9QRto.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to