Mark Nottingham wrote:
it's more an issue of whether the CC Attribution + ShareAlike 1.0 license terms are satisified by the I-D boilerplate. I've just asked CC that very question...
Not really. It says "identical". If it were identical, there wouldn't be a question.
Seems like you'd have to talk to Harvard (the copyright holder). It would be good, of course.
Robert Sayre
