On Apr 3, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Graham wrote:
So do you have an argument here as to why it should be required? All I'm seeing is that it's easy to workaround when the publisher omits it.
Agreed. Joe, that wasn't very convincing. I repeat, we've seen several very believable use-cases for why someone might want this, and no good arguments (that I can remember) that it would break anything. Sam has pointed out that no previous version of RSS has done this, which is a reasonable argument; except for we have use-cases, and nobody's shown that the cost is non-zero. -Tim
