/ Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Martin Duerst wrote: |> Of course I'm also for making an alternate link for a feed a |> MAY rather than a MUST. | | I'm in favor of keeping it a MUST, but I could live with it becoming a | SHOULD. As Sam says, all versions of RSS have made it a requirement. | Feeds without a link will probably break some clients, so you better | know what you're doing. OTOH, there have been some persuasive | arguments for making it optional. | | If we change it, SHOULD seems like the right way to go: "the | distinction between 'SHOULD' and 'MUST' in RFC2119 doesn't apply to | stupid implementors."[0] :)
SHOULD works for me.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | In a universe of electrons and selfish
http://nwalsh.com/ | genes, blind physical forces and
| genetic replication, some people are
| going to get hurt, other people are
| going to get lucky, and you won't find
| any rhyme or reason in it, nor any
| justice.--Richard Dawkins
pgpITUkxL4nY6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
