Tim Bray wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 8:09 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
An additional observation: neither of the examples in section 1.1 include the summary element. Suggestion: change the "content" in the first (minimal) example to "summary".
"<summary/>"?
No. --Tim
Perhaps it would help if I was more clear.
If you start with this:
<content>Some text.</content>
And you change content to summary, you end up with this:
<summary>Some text.</summary>
I happen to be of the opinion that in terms of linear spec space, these two examples with be the most cost effective portions of the spec. Most people, after seeing these, will have few questions and will only need to take seek out other sections if they have specific questions. Coupled with the existance of the feedvalidator, this isn't such a bad thing.
I'd like such people to have been exposed to both summary and content elements. Used in a manner that most people would find helpful: i.e., non-empty.
- Sam Ruby
