"The requirement on accessibility grounds for a required <atom:summary> is superfluous, because we have <atom:title> and one required text field is enough."
There's another solution compatible with this, which is to make title optional (which I've always supported). In most "title only" feeds, the title is usually wordy enough to make better sense as a summary or content.
(I'm still very concerned about dealing with the synthenic titles that will be unleashed by Atom in its current state)
Graham
