Oops; I meant draft-freed-media-type-reg.
On Apr 6, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Section 4: RFC 2045 is referenced. 2045 is on its way to being obsoleted by
draft-freed-mime-p4 (in the RFC Editor queue) and draft-freed-media-type-reg
(in last call). Can the more recent documents be referenced instead of
2045?
Rob/Mark?
I think all of the references would go to draft-freed-mime-p4.
As an aside -- it appears we may reference a few documents that are in the RFC editor queue, or about to be there. It might be good to set expectations within the WG as to what that means for our publication schedule.
-- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
