On Apr 11, 2005, at 22:23, Norman Walsh wrote:
But I hope not. I don't really want to have to rev the Atom format spec when XHTML 2.0 comes out. With care, I want to just put XHTML 2.0 stuff in my xhtml:div elements and let the down-stream appliation work it out.
It will be nice to have the div in the XHTML 1.x namespace and the contents in the XHTML 2.0 namespace. Namespace div indeed. :-)
But XHTML 2.0 is a different language form XHTML 1.x. Why do you think XHTML 2.0 fragments should be allowed as type='xhtml'? Just because XHTML 2.0 has "XHTML" in the name? If it is not about the name, why not DocBook NG fragments? One might argue that DocBook NG has a better chance of getting browser support than XHTML 2.0. ;-)
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
