On Apr 13, 2005, at 15:37, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-13 08:25]:On Apr 13, 2005, at 01:02, Robert Sayre wrote:[XHTML transitional reference]
Instead of saying "XHTML" it would be clearer to say "XHTML 1.x" or defining it in terms of the XHTML 1.x namespace URI.
He already did, no?
Not as clearly as possible. If 1.x is meant, it should be clearly pointed out. If 1.0 (not Ruby nor the What WG stuff) is meant, it should be clearly pointed out.
I prefer 1.x over 1.0 or 2.0.
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
