On 19 Apr 2005, at 10:33 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
In section 3.1.1.3
[
Escaped characters, such as "&" and ">", represent those characters, not
markup.
]
I also propose using < instead of >, as > isn't really a problem.
[
Escaped characters, such as "&" and "<", represent those characters (namely "&" and "<"), not markup.
]
No, the current wording is technically correct but the wording could be better:
The escaped versions of characters such as "&" and ">" represent those characters, not
markup.
Graham
