* Bill de hÃra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-21 17:55]: > My point (which still stands afaict) is that this is a > structural matter, to do with bleed from the container in the > content and that we've solved it with a different approach > altogether for namespaces than what's being suggested for > xml:base. I guess I'm trying to get the WG to think about at > this an 'document architecture' level rather than patching > issues on a per case basis as we find them.
On the structural level these all sound like issues of XML-in-XML in general, not Atom in specific. I donât mean in the sense of how to do that with XML at all; I mean in the sense of how XML vocabularies should be designed so they can be integrated cleanly. It looks like this is largely unexplored area without any best practices to speak of so far. This is merely an observation. Iâm not sure what it means for Atom. Regards, -- Aristotle
