Robert Sayre wrote:
Graham wrote:
On 6 Mar 2005, at 5:15 pm, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Your assumption is completely wrong. The WG will review the next draft before passing on to the IETF. The timing of the IETF meeting is completely inconsequential.
Can you fill us in on what's happening with the new draft, and what are future timetable looks like?
The draft has been submitted. We should be getting an I-D Announce message soon.
OK, here are some preliminary comments based on what's available from <http://www.atompub.org/2005/03/12/draft-ietf-atompub-format-06.html>:
- the RNC grammar is still unusable in that TRANG rejects the Schematron extensions; what do I need in addition to TRANG/JING to actually use that file?
- after removing the Schematron extensions: the RNC still is broken (missing double quotes after '"text')
- (after fixing that as well): atomPlainTextConstruct and atomXHTMLTextConstruct still use uppercased type names (in the collected RNC)
- the current RNC doesn't check for xhtml:div content below XHTML text constructs.
I've updated my experimental atom-06 feed at <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/webdav.atom>. Feedback appreciated...
Best regards, Julian
