At 6:47 PM +0100 4/27/05, Graham wrote:
On 27 Apr 2005, at 5:28 pm, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Proposal for thinking about: to simplify the spec, "atom:summary" should either be a MUST in all cases or a MAY in all cases. If it is just semantic like "atom:category", it should be a MAY. If it is inherently valuable like "atom:title", it should be a MUST.
What isn't "inherently valuable" about a "semantic". False dichotomy. What a load of unconstructive bollocks.
False reading. I was comparing "just semantic" to "inherently valuable". Both atom:category and atom:title are obviously both semantic, yes?
--Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
