The following Paces have not had their fate officially decided:
PaceOptionalSummary (+1)
PaceXmlContentWrapper (+1 -- there was plenty of opposition during the discussion of this one, but it seemed to be directed at both the current spec and the Pace, so I don't think it's clear whether people prefer the current spec or the Pace)
PaceCoConstraintsAreBad (written to draft 07 but I don't think the section to be changed changed since then)
PaceFeedIdOrAlternate (withdrawn by the author, so perhaps it shouldn't be listed here--written to draft 07 but the line in question hasn't changed since at least 06)
PaceFeedIdOrSelf (+1 -- just updated to draft 08 by changing a "6" to an "8")
Would a Pace be required to change the name of atom:image to atom:logo or could that be considered editorial? "Logo" is much more descriptive of what it's for, and would reduce confusion if somebody creates an extension for non-logo images.
I assume a Pace is coming for atom:id being repeatable within a document as long as the entries in question have different source feeds? (I'd give it a +1)
