Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Yeah why not? That does not have anything to do with Atom mentioning the xml:id attribute though. Authors can include it themselves if desired. xml:base and xml:lang solve specific Atom problems, xml:id doesn't do that. (Atom uses something else to uniquely identify each entry. It also couldn't reuse xml:id for this by the way.)
I don't see difference between xml:lang and xml:id in this context, xml:lang MAY be used in Atom and in my proposition xml:id MAY be used.
So are you saying XPointer should be part of the Atom specification as well..?
No, I say that xml:id should be part of Atom specyfication and when it will be then we can use XPointers in Atom (and other extensions) (analogy: Atom not need namespaces, XML rec don't defined xmlns attribute, but Atom has xmlns attribute, because it provide many features)
Again, what is the use case for Atom?
Grand of features to webdeveloper.
Dominik Tomaszuk
