Tim Bray wrote:
Mark Pilgrim agreed to turn his Atom autodiscovery draft into a WG draft, and has done so, see:
http://diveintomark.org/rfc/draft-ietf-atompub-autodiscovery-01.txt http://diveintomark.org/rfc/draft-ietf-atompub-autodiscovery-01.html http://diveintomark.org/rfc/draft-ietf-atompub-autodiscovery-01.xml
Although Mark's not subscribed, I've agreed to relay any changes that have WG consensus back to him for update; although if they're minor, I guess one of us could just rejigger the XML ourselves.
I scanned them and nothing objectionable leapt out at me, but please, could a few more people also have a look?
Assuming no errors, or rather that any errors we turn up are fixed, are there any objections to us submitting this I-D as a product of the Atompub WG? -Tim
One thing that immediately comes to mind that the references need to be checked, for instance for URI (not RFC2396 anymore) and for XML 1.0 (now at 3rd edition).
Best regards, Julian
