Graham wrote:
On 6 May 2005, at 3:50 am, Sam Ruby wrote:
FYI: we have an instance proof of this requiring an existing tool to do additional work:
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg13983.html
Tools will have to be updated to work with Atom? Scandalous.
+1 to the Pace
+1 as well. That something which has been developed against a previous draft will not work with a change in the format seems to be quite natural.
On the other hand, we also heard of feeds that need to "make up" links (which doesn't seem very useful to me).
Best regards,
Julian
