Thursday, May 5, 2005, 11:42:22 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
> -1 > Irrespective of whether I agree with this or not, I think the material > belongs in an implementor's guide, not the specification. -Tim I'm a bit uncomfortable with punting yet another issue into the Implementor's Guide when the WG has made no commitment to produce an Implementor's Guide. I'd be less suspicious of being fobbed off, if our charter was updated to include the Implementor's Guide as a deliverable. -- Dave
