--On Tuesday, May 10, 2005 09:12:09 AM -0700 Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 9:09 PM -0700 5/9/05, Walter Underwood wrote:Seriously, I don't mind "Atom 1.0" as long as the next version is "Atom 2.0".
+12
I'd also be happy with just "Atom" and saying "RFC XXXX Atom" when pressed for a version. Even with "Atom 1.0" we'll need to say which RFC.
If we choose a specific name, it *must* be in the RFC. Because the RFC must be a hit for that search.
wunder -- Walter Underwood Principal Architect Verity Ultraseek
