On 5/11/05, Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert, > > I'm trying to include you in this discussion and you're not > cooperating. You are the only person in the WG who has said there > shouldn't be any recommendation in the specification. You are vastly > outnumbered by people who've stated they'd be OK with it. The only > question now is the wording.
Is that right? I don't think it is. If you think I've stated something incorrectly, make your opinion known to the IESG. Robert Sayre
