> There was opposition to atom:modified because we couldn't see a need for it. > Now we have a need for it.
Eric: That most definitely wasn't the core reason for opposition, to my recollection. It was opposed because it can't be reliably produced by existing systems, among other things. (See the wiki for a survey of tools and the dates they support.) A big -1 for any pace that depends upon a mandatory atom:modified. -- Roger Benningfield
