On 5/19/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, breaking any link in my complicated chain of logic above > would cause the whole argument to collapse, which would be fine with me.
Maybe the requirement is useless. "If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and software MUST treat them as such." "MUST treat them as such" isn't particularly meaningful, and two atom:entry elements occuring anywhere are supposed to be describing the same entry. When I get CCed on an atom-syntax message, some of my email programs show two messages, and some show one. It's a security/annoyance trade-off, and I don't see why the format should be making that decision. Robert Sayre
