>> Does anyone remember the reason we have atom:contributor? I say drop it.
this is instructive reading...
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/NumberOfAuthorsDiscussion
> If we do allow multiple <author>s, we could ditch <contributor> and at
> the same time lessen the likelihood of ugliness like:
>
> <author><name>Raggett, D, Hors, A, and I Jacobs</name></author>
that string inside <author> is ugly.
that string inside <byline> is desired*
e.
* by some publishers, who by convention have the requirement that
contributors be listed in some proper order.