On 5/21/05, Bill de h�ra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there is consensus and I missed it, I'll withdraw and apologise for > distracting the WG. If an IETF process wizard says it's too late now, > technically or in the spirit of things, I'll withdraw. If the WG makes > it known that at this point in the process, I have to like them apples, > we're shipping, I'll withdraw. Otherwise as a WG member I'm of the > opinion that letting a specification get through that has no consensus, > and that we know has no consensus, is irresponsible.
Well, this is all process bullshit. What is the technical problem? What document is impossible to express with the current syntax? Robert Sayre
