On 5/21/05, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Sayre wrote: > > So, it's about disambiguating versions of an entry, right? > No. It has nothing to do with "versions" or even "variants." I have > explained that on numerous occasions. The denial of relevance to the issue > of "version" is even in the title of this thread. Read: "atom:modified > indicates temporal ORDER not version..." Clearly, you either aren't reading > what you're responding to or you simply don't understand what is written
Temporal order of what? They are all the same entry, so what is it you are temporally ordering? Why is this a new problem that only arises when we allow multiple IDs in the same feed? Robert Sayre
