On 23/5/05 8:53 AM, "Tim Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I was startled just now to realize that there's nothing there > to say that the feed-level author applies to entry-level when it's > not specified at the entry level. The intent seems pretty clear; > entry-level overrides source-level overrides feed-level, but it seems > like we should say that. > > Anybody think this is anything more than an editorial change? -Tim
I don't think we ever decided AGAINST inheritance, we only punted on explaining it. Thus, I've assumed that inheritance was implied. That reading the spec in isolation is ambiguous makes it a bad spec. We don't need a Pace, this is an editorial change. The editor might insist on camera ready copy though -- I hear he's a bit curmudgeonly lately. e.
