Graham wrote: > On 24 May 2005, at 9:40 am, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> On May 23, 2005, at 12:31, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> For the record: I am +1 on <http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/ >>> PaceOptionalXhtmlDiv>. > > -1, and additionally I don't think the Pace is even complete or > reliably implementable.
FYI, it is not, and I already explained in which extent (first, I forgot to say in the Pace that the same would apply for atom:content with type="xhtml"), that's why I pointed to a mail with some more explanation [1]. I was told not to edit the Pace to reflect it, so... [1] http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg15320.html -- Thomas Broyer
