On Wed, 25 May 2005 14:53:05 +0200, Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 to "atom:link" unless they are proper link elements.
What about atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED], then?
I'm fairly happy with the current situation.
Okay, but do you agree that the atom:uri element is a bit inconsistent with the rest of the format specification?
-- Asbj�rn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ �He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away�
