On 27/5/05 4:49 PM, "Thomas Broyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Replace "format-08" with "protocol-04" and you get it ;o) > http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-04.txt except I've been getting format-nn from http://atompub.org/... ;-) ok, for those in the know, could you please point out the parts of the protocol spec which have been mostly thrashed out and thought to be close to stable. I'd like to try reading those parts from the point of view of someone reading a spec without the benefit of reading all the discussions leading up to it. You know, just like we hope to have developers read the spec. Might be interesting to see which parts make sense and which don't. e.
