Paul Hoffman, Director, > >If there isn't enough time to change it > > Again: there isn't. The spec is in front of the IESG for > consideration, and it has been for many weeks now.
I knew that, but I was unaware of how un-updatable a step that was. I apologize for my ignorance. > > (although I think there is > >enough time left) > > Could you explain that? Are you proposing that we pull the spec back > from the IESG, make this change, and then ask them to look again? Or > something else I'm missing? No. I thought that there was room for updates to the draft during IESG consideration. That stemmed from unwarranted assumptions on my part, though. I feel the proposed changes are too small to worry about recalling it. On the other hand, if the spec is sent back by the IESG for other reasons then I suggest revisiting this issue. -- Jimmy Cerra https://nemo.dev.java.net __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
