--On Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:45:29 AM -0700 Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still -1, despite Bob's arguments, at least in part because we have no idea what kind of applications are going to be using signed entries and we shouldn't try to micromanage a future we don't understand. -Tim
I'm +1, because this is a "when features collide!" issue for Atom. We don't have to make it a SHOULD or a MUST, just point out that signed entries need to be standalone if they will ever be used outside of their feed context. wunder -- Walter Underwood Principal Architect Verity Ultraseek
