Mark Baker wrote: > IMO, it matters not that no spec prescribes the use of this media type > for Atom 0.3 feeds. What matters is whether it's in use today, which > we seem to agree is the case. This seems an important piece of > information that implementors should know, which is my motivation for > asking that it be called out in the "interoperability considerations" > section of the template. Something like; > > Interoperability considerations: Some existing agents and feeds that > support the Atom 0.3 specification, make use of this media > type despite Atom 0.3 not being compatible with Atom 1.0.
In the spirit of that point about 0.3 being served with the media type being an interop issue - what are the behaviors which will lead to interoperation? The above text is only leads one to ask "and I should do what here?" and doesn't say anything useful about what to do. cheers Bill
