Heh... the same questions could be asked about a lot of stuff embedded
in RSS but that's not the issue ;-) ... fh:prev works fine. There
really isn't a strong argument in favor of link. I have my own personal
preferences but those are actually quite irrelevant :-) I'll still
maintain that fh:stateful is quite unnecessary but doesn't hurt anything
if it's used -- you'll just need to be explicit about such things as
what if a fh:prev is used without a fh:stateful being present.
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Not a problem, as such, but I don't see any benefit to reuse. It also
begs the question of what an atom element in a non-Atom document
means, how it's processed, etc.
On 18/07/2005, at 1:03 PM, James M Snell wrote:
There is precedence for using atom:link in RSS feeds. see http://
feeds.feedburner.com/ITConversations-EverythingMP3. I really don't
think it's a problem.
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
