* Sjoerd Visscher wrote: >A while ago we had a discussion about how xml:base should be used. >We didn't reach a conclusion, but I think we need to act.
How to use xml:base is a matter of the xml:base specification and (less so) the resource identifier specifications. If you think xml:base is unclear in this regard, please let the W3C XML Core Working Group know. >Now I think that no matter what we decide, we should not do >something that the writer of the URI spec thinks is an abuse. "We" as in there is specific text in one of the atompub drafts that make misleading suggestions that are inconsistent with the xml:base Recommendation or RFC 3986/7 other than some con- fusion about how to handle IRIs in non-Unicode encoded Atom documents that are not in NFC? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
