Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:17 AM +1000 8/22/05, Eric Scheid wrote: > > >In this example, can anything intelligent be said about the various > >different locations? Is my intent clear, or are there clear ambiguities? > > > ><feed ...> > > ... > > <geo:coords>location#1</geo:coords> > > <author> > > <name>foo</name> > > <geo:coords>location#2</geo:coords> > > </author> > > <entry> > > <author> > > <name>foo</name> > > <geo:coords>location#3</geo:coords> > > </author> > > <geo:coords>location#4</geo:coords> > > <content>...</content> > > ... > > </entry> > ></feed> > > #2 through #4 seem understandable, but what the heck is #1? "The > place where this feed was put together"? "The place where this feed > was originally grabbed from"?
I do something similar, intending it to mean "the location of the items described by this feed" (when there is a single location). I don't know whether any software understands my intent... <http://www.ticketswitch.com/cgi-bin/atom_feed.exe?s_geo=53.82:-3.05:10> Regards, Peter -- Peter Robinson <http://www.ticketswitch.com/>
