I don't think not using the URI is a problem so long as the intent is to
register the value and you make an attempt at standardization. The
problems arise when folks use names when they have no intention of
standardizing or registering.
- James
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Looks like the whole "use URIs for non-registered values" approach
has already gone by the wayside. Oh, well.
Next time, it should just be URIs, period -- no shortcuts.
On 09/10/2005, at 3:41 PM, James Holderness wrote:
They have a note next to each saying "This value is pending IETF
registration". Does that mean they've actually started some kind of
registration process or they're just hoping to do so at some point
in the future?
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
