On 17/10/05 9:30 PM, "Lindsley Brett-ABL001" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to toss out another thought - since the updated time of a > feed is required, maybe it can be used to help determine the feed > order/history. > For example, if following a "next" link (or pick your favorite term), if > the updated time gets older, then the client can understand these > entries are from an earlier time. If when following the "next" link the > updated time stays the same, then the client can assume this is just > more of the same collection from the previous point in time (unordered > collection). Just a thought... Won't work -- older date-paged archives may have an entry updated anytime in the future, and thus not only does that entry get a more recent atom:updated than any entries intervening then and now, but the feed itself will also get a more recent atom:updated. e.
